The following links show pain location patterns in an ongoing TMT
clinical study (almost 10,000 subjects to date):








Most pain shapes were drawn on a TMT 2D pain
drawing program (with front and back views of the human
body) and the calculated pain centroids (the mathematical
center of each pain shape) were then mapped to
TMT's 3D human body model. Data were reviewed to confirm
comparable representation on the left and right sides of the
body; data were then bilateralized with left-sided centroids
being added to the comparable right side of the body, and
vice versa.
The "Chronic Pain" link combines
data from people with multiple types of pain (lower
back/sciatica, knee, shoulder, hip, distal peripheral
neuropathy, wrist pain/carpal tunnel syndrome, headache, jaw
pain /TMJ, toothache). The Peripheral Neuropathy link
includes data primarily from people meeting the criteria of
Portenoy et al (2005) for neuropathic pain and were then
culled to represent only peripheral limb pain
(forearm/wrist/hand and lower leg/ankle/foot), probably
representing small fiber peripheral neuropathy. The Bone
Metastasis Pain data (courtesy of Charles Cleeland of the MD
Anderson Cancer Center, U. Texas, Houston) is derived from
pain drawings made using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and
then transferred to the TMT 2D coordinate space and then to
the TMT 3D coordinate space.
The "Bone Metastasis Location on Bone Scan" data was
obtained by mapping bone scans with bone metastases
(primarily from US academic centers) to the common
coordinate space of the TMT 2D drawing model (Note that the
3D representation of the 2D bone scan metastasis data is
provided purely for comparison with the front and back views
of the pain data in bone metastasis patients, since the 3D
model assumes that the front/back view data is on the body
surface, which assumption is not met by the internally
located bony skeleton).
Pending full analysis of the data, the following
conclusions seems reasonable:
o There are six centers of knee pain centroids (lateral,
central and medial pain in both front and back views) as
shown by kernel density estimation and 2D point cluster
segmentation using mixture modeling and expectation
maximization.
o Sciatica pain occurs primarily in the S1 distribution
(whereas the literature usually just says that L5 + S1
accounts for 95% of sciatica).
o Shoulder pain is concentrated near the shoulder joint
capsule and the scapula.
o Hip pain is concentrated antero-lateral to the hip joint.
o For distal peripheral neuropathy pain (subjects primarily
meeting Portenoy diagnostic neuropathy criteria or with a
previous diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy from their
healthcare provider, and in whom pain centroids were present
in the distal limbs), hand/wrist/forearm pain is primarily
on the medial side whereas lower limb pain centroids are
centrally distributed in the front and back of the
feet/ankles/lower leg (normally representing involvement of
the entire anterior, posterior, lateral and medial areas at
a given vertical level).
o Wrist pain in subjects most of whom met multiple
diagnostic criteria for carpal tunnel syndrome, is primarily
in the anterior and posterior sensory distribution of the
median nerve.
o Headache is primarily located on the forehead and the back
of the head just above the neck.
o Jaw pain in subjects most of whom met multiple diagnostic
criteria for temporo-mandibular joint syndrome (TMJ) is
primarily located over the temporo-mandibular joint.
o Toothache is primarily located over the upper and lower
molars.
TMT’s triangulation-based mapping technology provides a
powerful and flexible means for integrated analysis of
disparate databases of biological shapes. Spatial
distribution patterns of different variables can be compared
within the same coordinate space. Thus, for bone metastasis
data we compared the location of bony metastases on
individual patient bone scans, pain in metastasis patients,
pain in non-metastasis patients, body surface outlines, and
bony skeleton outlines – all in the same coordinate space.
• The TMT bone scan analysis provides a unique quantitative
display of the distribution of bone metastases. Each bone
scan (obtained primarily from US academic centers) was
individually mapped to the TMT coordinate space (a rather
laborious procedure). The TMT bone scan map appears
consistent with a literature review of articles providing
textual descriptions of the spatial distribution of bone
metastases.
• The MDA pain drawing database in bone mets patients
appears consistent with the aggregate distribution of bony
metastases.
• A comparison of the MDA pain drawing database in bone mets
patients appears to show (versus pain in non-cancer
subjects) 1) a higher prevalence of pain in the middle/upper
spine, the rib cage, and the femur and tibia, and 2) a lower
prevalence of pain in the forearm/wrist/hand and the knee.
Pain in the lower back, shoulder area and head are common in both patients
with bone metastases and subjects with non-metastasis pain.
|